[australia] FW: Engaging contributors [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

[Ritchie, Michele]

At Marius' request, I am re-posting this reply on the list.
 
kind regards
Michele Ritchie
Information Manager
National Measurement Institute
 

________________________________

From: Ritchie, Michele 
Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2006 11:15 AM
To: 'Marius Coomans'
Subject: RE: [australia] Engaging contributors [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]


Marius
 
I recall at a seminar I went to some years ago, there were some
suggestions as to how to get people to contribute and that was to give
rewards or incentives; some ways include:
 

*	
	publish (in a newsletter?) how many times this month each person
has contributed - sometimes people get competitive and want others to
see they have contributed the most for the month
*	
	have a monthly reward for the person who has contributed the
most - bottle of wine, movie voucher etc.
*	
	make contributing to the intranet one of the goals in their
Peformance Appraisal contract; they agree to contribute content at least
once a month or whatever, so then you have some accountability.

I have not used these ideas in practice, but I could see them working in
some organisations.
 
kind regards
 
Michele Ritchie
Information Manager 
National Measurement Institute 
PO Box 385,  Pymble  NSW  2073
AUSTRALIA 
+61 2 9449 0129 (t)    +61 2 9449 1653 (f) 
michele.ritchie at measurement.gov.au 
http://www.measurement.gov.au <http://www.measurement.gov.au/>  
 
Save time, save stress ... ask a Librarian.
 

________________________________

From: australia-bounces at lists.cmprofessionals.org
[mailto:australia-bounces at lists.cmprofessionals.org] On Behalf Of Marius
Coomans
Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2006 9:18 AM
To: australia at lists.cmprofessionals.org
Subject: [australia] Engaging contributors


I received some encouraging emails in response to my last message, so
I'm sufficiently emboldened to help breath a bit of life into this list.
With its eclectic array of subscribers, there is bound to be a great
store of wisdom and experience here. 
 
So:
 
Over the past 10 years, our industry has (largely) mastered the
technology and processes to successfully implement Content Management
Systems. However, in many cases, those systems still fail to engage
those who have most content to contribute. 
 
Why is that? How can our success rate be improved? How do we balance
"process" with "creativity"? Can we leverage the success of Weblogs and
that of Wikipedia? 
 
 
Marius Coomans
Active Web Communications

*************************************************************************
The information contained in this e-mail, and any attachments to it,
is intended for the use of the addressee and is confidential.  If you
are not the intended recipient you must not use, disclose, read,
forward, copy or retain any of the information.  If you received this
e-mail in error, please delete it and notify the sender by return
e-mail or telephone.

The Commonwealth does not warrant that any attachments are free
from viruses or any other defects.  You assume all liability for any
loss, damage or other consequences which may arise from opening
or using the attachments.
*************************************************************************


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.cmsml.org/pipermail/australia/attachments/20060713/5bed7e71/attachment.html